Cultural Competence in Nursing: Is Education Important for Nurses’ Cultural Competence?
Abstraction
Cultural competency is an of import component of supplying nursing and wellness attention that is able to run into the demands of all clients. The literature seems to demo that nurses are missing in cultural competency, despite the development of theoretical accounts of cultural competency that have been researched and developed. The geographic expedition of cardinal words and a hunt of literature identified instruction as an of import factors in the development of cultural competency, within the profession and within single nurses. Models of cultural competency describe it as a procedure, and educational programmes for nurses have been demonstrated to hold differing grades of success for back uping this.
A critical reappraisal of five chosen research articles demonstrates that instruction for cultural competency can better nurses’ cultural competency. The literature is limited by little sample sizes, localization of function, and some methodological issues, including a prevailing focal point on quantitative research, which is based on extant theoretical accounts. It might be good to reexamine the pertinence of this theoretical account in the modern, planetary health care context. Contentss
TitlePage No.
Abstract2
Introduction4
Methodology6
Discussion7
Critical Review8
Conclusion28
References30
Introduction
The construct of cultural competency has come to the bow in nursing theory and pattern in research old ages ( Beach et al, 2006 ) . Cooper Brathwaite 92005 ) suggests that this is a “result of nurses interacting on a regular basis with clients from a assortment of culturally diverse backgrounds and nurses’ duty to supply them with appropriate attention that is consistent with their single demands, values, and beliefs.” This consumer or patient-focused theoretical account of health care bringing has emerged from consumerist motions and better information around wellness and health care, ensuing in greater consumer power and greater patient engagement in health care services. It may besides ensue from societal reorientations, and is enshrined in political drivers such asThe NHS Plan( DoH, 2000 ) . Suh ( 2004 ) shows that this has meant the outgrowth of cultural competency within instruction and health care pattern.
Cultural competency has been defined as a procedure, non merely a set of knowledge-based facts ( Campinha Bacote, 2002 ) . This theoretical account is summarised as follows:
“1. Cultural competency is a procedure, non an event.
2. Cultural competency consists of five concepts: cultural consciousness, cultural cognition, cultural accomplishment, cultural brushs, and cultural desire.
3. There is more fluctuation within cultural groups than across cultural groups ( intra-ethnic fluctuation ) .
4. There is a direct relationship between the degree of competency of wellness attention suppliers and their ability to supply culturally antiphonal wellness attention services.
5. Cultural competency is an indispensable constituent in renderingeffective and culturally antiphonal services to culturally and ethnically diverse clients.” ( Campinha-Bacote, 2002 ) .
This theoretical account described above is the most permeant to be found within the literature, and it is the theoretical account upon which the bulk of recent surveies of cultural competency within nursing is based. It can be seen from this merely how complex the construct is. Education, and cultural competency inclusion in instruction, from the beginning of nurse preparation, seems to be of import ( Krainovich-Miller et Al, 2008 ; Cooper Brathwaite and Majumder, 2006 ) . Evans and Greenberg ( 2006 ) province that one of the grounds why it is of such importance is because of the deficiency of cultural and cultural diverseness amongst nursing pupils and nursing work forces in a batch of topographic points. Ross ( 2006 ) demonstrates that nurses can lend to cultural competency throughout health care services by being culturally competent.
Patient attention quality and patient experience is founded on the ideals of cultural competency ( Narayanasamy and White, 2005 ) .” Culturally competent attention is a major factor impacting the satisfaction degree of diverse clients” ( Xu et al, 2006 P 362 ) . “The end is to minimise cultural disagreement and better patient-provider communicating, therefore cut down chances for mistakes, addition conformity, and bring forth better clinical outcomes.” ( Dreher and McNaughton, 2002 P 182 ) . It can profit about every country of health care pattern ( O’Shaughnessy and Tilki, 2007 ; Mahoney and Engebretson, 2006 ) . It is of significance in about every health care context ( Chenowethm et al, 2006 ; O’Shaughnessy and TIlki, 2007 ) Cowan and Norman ( 2006 ) suggest that a solution to nursing deficits would be to be able to back up the inclusion of international nurses, but that all nurses need cultural competency to let this to work.
This essay describes a critical reappraisal of the literature environing cultural competency for nursing pattern.
Methodology
The writer carried out a idea shower around the impression of cultural competency in nursing to place cardinal words. The undermentioned key words were used to seek the literature: cultural competency ; Culture and faith ; Nurse instruction ; Transcultural attention. The nursing literature was so searched utilizing these cardinal footings. The literature was non limited to articles published in any clip period because the seminal theoretical accounts of cultural competency are non recent and needed to be included. Abstractions were read, a short list of full text articles was complied, and finally a figure of articles were critiqued and included in this reappraisal. Discussion
The chosen review theoretical account is that of Caldwell et Al ( 2005 ) , who carried out a thorough critical reappraisal of the literature around assessment of nursing research articles, and of the sorts of theoretical accounts presently available which critique healthcare research. This reappraisal demonstrates a figure of cardinal characteristics of the procedure of measuring primary research articles in relation to quality and degree of grounds for application to pattern, and identifies a clear model which can be applied to a critical reappraisal such as this, and can be used for both qualitative and quantitative research paper appraisal ( Caldwell et al, 2005 ) . The writer has utilised this model to construction the contents of each subject below.
Having conducted the literature hunt and initial geographic expedition, the writer shortlisted a figure of primary articles which were pertinent to the research inquiry, and identified those which would be suited for critical reappraisal. International articles were non excluded, as described above, because of the nature of the inquiry, with its focal point on transultural nursing and cultural competency in nursing. Merely reexamining articles depicting research performed in one national context would hold possibly been excessively restricting for this assignment, although there would hold been some advantage in application to the author’s ain clinical scene. The articles were analysed utilizing the model, and the findings so grouped under thematic headers, as demonstrated below. The analysis of the articles is structured following the Caldwell et Al ( 2005 ) model.
Critical Review
Title: Does the rubric reflect the content ( Caldwell et al, 2005 ) .
The Reeves and Fogg Article ( 2006 ) reflects much of what the focal point of the article is on, and surely indicates the primary focal point of the survey. However, it does non bespeak what type of research this is, ie qualitative or quantitative, as both methods can be used to mensurate perceptual experiences ( Grix, 2004 ) , and it besides does non truly reflect the educational background of the research, although it was the cultural competency constituent of nurse instruction programmes which gave rise to the survey.
Cooper Brathwaite’s ( 2005 ) rubric is really clear and indicates the focal point of the survey, but does non bespeak the survey population or context, which would hold been utile. Berlin et al’s ( 2006 ) rubric besides efficaciously indicates the content and focal point of the survey: “Working conditions and cultural competency when interacting with kids and parents of foreign origin – Primary Child Health Nurses’ opinions” ( p 160 ) . The methodological orientation of this survey is non evident from the rubric, as either of the two research paradigms could be used to turn to ‘opinions’ . Kardong-Edgren et al’s ( 2005 ) rubric is besides an effectual sum-up, but once more, does non turn to the paradigm or methodological analysis of the research, and the same is true of Sargent et Al ( 2005 ) , although their rubric is implicative of the research context.
Are the writers believable?
The Reeves and Fogg ( 2006 ) article states that the writers come from St Anselm college, but they do non give their makings, functions, backgrounds or any other indicant of their accomplishments or competency to transport out this research. Although the manner and presentation of the research suggests a grade of research acumen and academic cogency, there is small else to establish any appraisal of their credibleness on. Cooper Brathwaite ( 2005 ) cites topographic point of work as being the Durham regional wellness section, but does non supply her professional makings or any inside informations of her research expertness. Berlin et Al ( 2006 ) cite the makings of the research workers, and as two of them are registered nurses, and all of them have PhDs, it could be argued that they are so believable. The same is true of Kardong-Edgren et Al ( 2005 ) , as all but one of the writers have PhDs, and all but one of the writers is a nurse. Sargent et Al ( 2005 ) province the writers work in an academic environment, but there is no item given of their makings or expertness, so it is non possible to measure their credibleness.
Does the abstract summarise the cardinal constituents?
The abstract for the Reeves and Fogg ( 2006 ) article efficaciously summarises the paper and the survey, and one of its strengths is that it instantly identifies the nature of the research. “This article describes a qualitative survey that explored the perceptual experiences of graduating pupils from a nor’-east baccalaureate nursing plan sing their life experiences with cultural diversity” ( Reeves and Fogg, 2006 P 171 ) .The abstract besides contains the sample size, informations analysis processes, findings and construction of the paper, and made it easy to measure the paper on reading the abstract entirely, in relation to its suitableness for this critical literature reappraisal.
Cooper Brathwaite ( 2005 ) instantly presents the focal point of the research in the abstract, the methodological analysis, and the chief conceptual model, therefore supplying a really effectual abstract, although it would hold been good for the national context ( Canada ) to hold been cited. Berlin et al’s ( 2006 ) abstract is structured with sub-headings and really efficaciously summarises the full survey, doing it easy to measure the relevancy and utility of the paper merely from the abstract. Kardong-Edgren et Al ( 2005 ) do non utilize sub-headings but do show a sum-up of the research method, sample, findings and decisions. Sargent et al’s ( 2005 ) abstract summarises the survey, and besides informs the reader of the theoretical account of cultural competency upon which the survey is based, which is another strength.
Is the principle for set abouting the research clearly outlined?
Reeves and Fogg ( 2006 ) do sketch the principle for set abouting the research, including the demand to understand native civilization, the increasing complexness of their local cultural mix, and on the authors’ perceptual experience that “many New Hampshire nursing pupils think there is no demand to measure their client’s civilization and have tended to cut down designation of civilization to differences in linguistic communication and physical appearances.” ( p 172 ) . They further province that “The principle for the current survey was to place factors and/or forms that aided or hindered the development of cultural competency in nursing students.” ( Reeves and Fogg, 2006 P 172 ) .
Cooper Brathwaite ( 2005 ) provides the principle for the research in the Background subdivision, associating the survey to the demand to develop cultural competency through instruction for nurses, to let “enable nurses to present culturally appropriate interventions” ( p 361 ) . However, the principle is besides caught up in the subdivision depicting the intent of the survey, which will be dealt with below in relation to the purpose of the survey. Berlin et Al ( 2006 ) provide the principle in the debut, and warrant the survey in relation to the importance of cultural competency for nurses, and the deficiency of research on Primary Children’s Health Nurses’ cultural competency. Kardong-Edgren et Al ( 2005 ) present a principle based on old work which supports the importance of cultural competency in nursing attention, and province:
“There are few empirical grounds that describe the cognition, attitudes, or accomplishments of module toward caring for persons from diverse civilizations. Because cultural competency of module called upon to be after and present educational intercessions is a requirement for effectual plan results, farther geographic expedition of their cognition, attitudes, and accomplishments is needed.” ( p 175 ) .
This suggests that the footing for cultural competency may be dependent upon the quality of instruction that pupils achieve, and so this survey attempts to better that quality through developing insight into Faculty cognition around this topic.
Sargent et Al ( 2005 ) depict their principle in relation to a alteration in course of study in one establishment in order to develop cultural competence amongst nursing pupils. The survey is hence an appraisal of whether the designed programme of acquisition was effectual in developing cultural competency in these pupils.
Is the literature reappraisal comprehensive and up to day of the month?
The literature reappraisal in the Reeves and Fogg ( 2006 ) is really much placed within an American health care and cultural sphere, and the type of paperss and articles referred to clearly reflect this. The writers incorporate the dominant theoretical account of cultural competency, that of Campinha-Bacote ( 1996, 1999 ) , but there are really few other beginnings cited, and no critical reappraisal of the current literature or of primary research. Therefore, the literature reappraisal in this case is a important failing of this survey, and it would look that the survey itself is derived from personal involvement, which may be a beginning of prejudice.
Similarly, Cooper Brathwaite ( 2005 ) provides a really brief, and this writer would reason, unequal literature reappraisal, which does non truly measure the quality of much other research in similar countries. More clip is devoted to the explication of the construct and theoretical account of cultural competency, which is of import, but limits the utility of the survey as it is difficult to put it within a theoretical context ( Denscome, 2002 ) . Conversely, the literature reappraisal in Berlin et al’s ( 2006 ) survey sets the context more clearly and whilst a trade of clip is spent on conceptual lucidity, the focal point of the literature reappraisal is service bringing. However, this writer feels that a longer, more elaborate, more critical reappraisal of the literature would hold enhanced this paper.
The same could be said of Kardong-Edgren et Al ( 2005 ) , who provide a really effectual sum-up of the research, and do at least reference the sorts of surveies that they are looking at, although they do non notice much on the quality of the research. Kardong-Edgren et Al ( 2005 ) usage this literature reappraisal to place the spreads in the literature and farther contextualise and warrant their ain survey. The quality of the literature reappraisal lends some credibleness to the survey, it would look, because it allows the reader to measure if the research workers have taken the current cognition base into history, instead than merely researching something which involvements them ( Baker, 2006 ) . Sargent et Al ( 2005 ) supply a comprehensive and critical literature reappraisal which is good applied to their research survey, but besides concentrate on the same theoretical accounts of cultural competency without oppugning them.
Is the purpose of the research clearly stated?
Reeves and Fogg ( 2006 ) supply drawn-out and elaborate purposes for the survey:
The specific purposes of the research workers were to ( a ) addition information about each participant’s cultural heritage, ( B ) explore life experiences before come ining the nursing plan, ( degree Celsius ) explore students’ perceptual experiences of educational and clinical experiences in the nursing plan that affected their ability to supply culturally competent attention and their reactions to these experiences, and ( vitamin D ) addition information about the participants’ perceptual experiences of their cognition of transcultural nursing.” These are rather comprehensive purposes, and necessitate the research workers to derive a batch of item, which, in relation to the little sample size, and despite this being a qualitative survey, seem to be a instead tall order. Gerrish and Lacey ( 2006 ) and Denscome ( 2002 ) argue that any survey should hold clearly defined, manageable purposes, but that these should non be excessively complex or effort to accomplish excessively much.
Cooper Brathwaite ( 2005 ) summarises the purpose of the survey efficaciously: “This survey evaluated the effectivity of an instructional class in increasing PHNs’ degree of cultural competency. The aim was to find the effects of the class on PHNs’ perceived cultural competence” ( p 361 ) . The purpose here non merely lets the reader know the way of the research but besides something about the research focal point, that of Public Health Nurses.
Berlin et Al ( 2006 ) summarize the purpose of their research as being “ to look into the PCH Nurses’ working conditions and cultural competency when interacting with kids and parents of foreign origin.” ( p 161 ) . They besides specify two distinguishable inquiries that they are inquiring as portion of the survey:
“1 What are the PCH Nurses’ sentiments sing certain facets of their on the job conditions: do they see troubles and are any specific factors associated with these troubles?
2 What cultural competency do the PCH Nurses have, and what are their ain sentiments on this competency when interacting with kids and parents of foreign beginning? ” ( Berlin et al, 2006 P 161 ) .
These research inquiries are really applicable to pattern and show the relevancy and importance of the survey.
Kardong-Edgren et Al ( 2005 ) besides set out their purposes clearly and unambiguously:
“The intent of this survey was to depict nursing module attitudes, perceived cultural cognition, and cultural accomplishment in caring for patients from four cultural groups—Hispanics, African Americans, Southeast Asians, and Anglos—and to research the relationships between the respondents’ attitudes and perceived degree of assurance in cognition and selected demographic characteristics.” ( p 176 ) .
This clearly sets the scene for the research, and once more, allows the reader to measure the relevancy of the research. Framing a clear purpose or research inquiry is a cardinal constituent of good quality primary research ( Easton et al, 2000 ) . Sargent et Al ( 2005 ) provide one simple purpose: “A survey was conducted to measure the development of cultural competency in pupils and module in this baccalaureate program” ( p 216 ) .
All of the surveies have focused clearly on a definable purpose and return to this purpose in replying the research inquiry, proposing that the finding of the purpose or research inquiry defined the procedure of question.
Are all ethical issues identified and addressed?
Ethical issues are non really clearly addressed in the Reeves and Fogg ( 2006 ) survey, and other than permission being obtained from the Chair of the Nursing Department and from the University’s research board ( IRB ) , there is no existent treatment of moralss. The writers do province that they chose graduating pupils because one of the research workers was on the instruction Faculty ( Reeves and Fogg, 2006 ) , from which we can say that they were seeking to avoid coercion or prejudice or their findings. But the deficiency of ethical consideration represents a considerable failing to this survey. At the really least, the regard for single self-respect, human rights, and the demand for informed consent ( Declaration of Helsinki, 1965 ; Nuremburg Code, 1949 ) should underpin any research survey. Ethical motives within healthcare research serves to protect the person and the populace ( Cooper, 2006 ) , and this writer can merely presume that the permission processes involved some sort of ethical assessment. This should hold been made much more crystalline.
Cooper Brathwaite ( 2005 ) addresses ethical issues by saying “The survey received ethical blessing by the Research Ethics Board of the take parting institution.” ( p 365 ) . Research moralss committees support the care of ethical, purposeful, utile research which does non endanger or straiten vulnerable participants ( Grix, 2004 ; Parahoo, 2006 ) . In this survey, informed consent was provided, and namelessness was maintained. Researcher influence was minimised by the usage of especially-employed research helpers ( Cooper Brathwaite, 2005 ) .
Berlin et Al ( 2006 ) devote more attending to describing ethical issues within their survey:
“The survey was approved by The Ethical Committee at Huddinge University Hospital, Karolinska Institute ( enrollment figure 373/2 ) . Before the questionnaire was sent out, a imperativeness point was published in the PCHC services localnewspaper to fix and inform the PCHNurses about the approaching questionnaire. A signifier was attached to the questionnaire with information on the intent of the survey. The participants were besides informed that the survey was confidential, voluntary and anon. . The questionnaires were returned in a closed envelope, to a secretary with no connexion to the undertaking. The secretary kept the list of names including the codifications. Therefore, the undertaking leader and the research squad did non cognize the individuality of the people replying the questionnaires.” ( p 162-163 ) .
This is a comprehensive attack and sum-up of how ethical issues were managed, and surely adds strength to the survey, peculiarly as participants were being asked to notice on working conditions, and if the survey were non wholly confidential, this could do them vulnerable in their workplace, or do them less likely to give honest responses.
Kardong-Edgren et Al ( 2005 ) do some mention to ethical issues:
“Prior to data aggregation, the undertaking was approved by the University Institutional Review Board. Participation was voluntary and confidentiality was protected through cryptography of questionnaires and coverage of group informations merely. The intent of the undertaking, the associated hazards, and the possible part of the survey were described in the written consent statement.” ( p 177 ) .
This shows that an blessing procedure was undergone, and that some attention was taken to protect the namelessness of participants. The informations aggregation instrument and procedure was minimum in relation to effects on participants. However, there was an inducement in this survey, and this writer would oppugn the ethical impact of utilizing an inducement.
Sargent et Al ( 2005 ) besides addresses ethical issues, mentioning to the cardinal ethical constructs.
“Approval for the survey was obtained from the KSU Institutional Review Board and from the CON Research Committee. Participants were informed both verbally by the research worker and in written signifier of their right to decline or end engagement without punishment. Submission of the questionnaire to the research worker implied consent to take part. No placing information appeared on the questionnaire.” ( p 217 ) .
However, given the elaborate geographic expedition of the issue in relation to the justification, contextualisation and literature reappraisal elsewhere in this survey, this writer believes that these research workers could hold explored more of the ethical dimensions, including holding Faculty carry out research worker on pupils, and the issues environing power and possible coercion contained in this.
Is the methodological analysis defined and justified?
Are the philosophical background and survey design identified and the principle for pick of design evident?
It is of import to specify the ontological and methodological orientations of the research workers and the survey ( Dawson, 2002 ) . Reeves and Fogg ( 2006 ) do specify their methodological analysis, and they suggest that it is a deficiency of information about pupil nurses’ experiences with people from other civilizations, peculiarly qualitative question, which has justified their qualitative attack. Again, they could hold been more expressed about the implicit in research doctrine.
Cooper Brathwaite ( 2005 ) “used a one-group perennial steps design to measure the effectivity of the course” followed by “a semi structured questionnaire at 3 months post execution of the class to supply an in deepness apprehension of the impact of the class on participants.” ( p364 ) . The methodological analysis is defined as a assorted methods attack, but there is non a batch of justification for this attack. Harmonizing to Johnson and Onwuegbuzie, ( 2004 ) , assorted methods research provides the research worker with the possible advantages of both qualitative and quantitative attacks to research, therefore beef uping the survey design and the findings of the research. However, this writer would reason that the quality of the methodological analysis still needs to be good, and in this instance, the quantitative research is still slightly ill defined, as with the old survey, in relation to the philosophical background to its development.
.
Berlin et Al ( 2006 ) depict a questionnaire based survey, in which the methodological analysis of the research is clearly outlined. Kardong-Edgren et Al ( 2005 ) depict their survey in footings of their informations aggregation tools, which constitute three informations aggregation instruments and a demographic study, to roll up a comprehensive sum of informations which covers a scope of variables. Sargent et Al ( 2005 ) besides merely depict their survey in footings of informations aggregation tools. This seems to be a convention amongst these surveies, that there is no existent treatment of the ontological or philosophical orientation of the research in relation to the pick of methodological analysis. The writers all justify the survey, but non the attack that they have used, and given the holistic nature of nursing pattern, this would hold enhanced transparence. The premise seems to be that the usage of a quantitative attack requires no justification or treatment. This writer believes this is an erroneous premise.
Are the major constructs identified? ( Qualitative Studies )
Is there an experimental hypothesis clearly stated? ( Quantitative Studies )
Are the cardinal variables defined? ( Quantitative Studies )
Reeves and Fogg ( 2006 ) province that they are utilizing “Leininger’s ( 1995 ) ethnonursing qualitative research method based on an unfastened find approach” ( Reeves and Fogg, 2006 P 173 ) . More information about this theoretical account would hold been utile to judge whether the writers are adhering closely to it ( Holliday, 2002 ) . They use the Campina-Bacote’s ( 1997 ) stock list for measuring cultural competency, and the survey would look to be oriented in established theoretical accounts about cultural competency. Again, more transparence of constructs would better this survey. Similarly, Cooper Brathwaite ( 2005 ) uses Campina-Bacote’s ( 1999 ) theoretical account. Cooper Brathwaite ( 2005 ) devotes a considerable proportion of the paper to treatment of this theoretical account and its conceptual footing. This is a positive facet of the survey, as it establishes the underpinning significances and helps the reader to understand precisely what is being researched. Cooper-Brathwaite ( 2005 ) defines the cardinal variables but presents a research inquiry instead than a hypothesis. Berlin et Al ( 2006 ) depict all the variables in great item, both in the design of the questionnaire which is the foundation of the research, and in the information analysis. Kardong-Edgren et Al ( 2005 ) do specify all of the variables impacting their survey, and have addressed these through the usage of four informations aggregation instruments ( surveys/questionnaires ) . Sargent et Al ( 2005 ) besides really clearly define variables in relation to their informations aggregation instruments.
Is the context of the survey outlined?
Reeves and Fogg ( 2006 ) outline the survey context as being the geographical and institutional context of their location and educational establishment. Understanding the context can help the reader to measure the transferability of the findings in this sort of survey ( Kearney, 2001 ) . Cooper Brathwaite ( 2005 ) describes the conceptual context, as discussed above, the theoretical context, but does non depict in any item the location and context of the class which is being implemented. Berlin et Al ( 2006 ) depict the context of the primary wellness attention Centres which are the working environment of the survey participants and find the nature of the responses to the survey. Kardong-Edgren et Al ( 2005 ) clearly define their context, being an academic context in which those recruited were chiefly from healthcare instruction scenes.
Sargent et Al ( 2005 ) summarize their context efficaciously, saying that “the geographic location for the survey was a big, province university in a Midwestern American little metropolis. Subjects in the survey come from both rural countries and metropoliss. Neighboring metropoliss have populations of 30 % cultural minorities.” ( p 217 ) .
Understanding the context of these surveies has allowed the writer to understand the research in relation to their ain pattern. However, it besides demonstrates that the contexts are limited to certain countries, and more comprehensive research is required.
Is the choice of participants described and the sampling method identified?
Reeves and Fogg ( 2006 ) chose purposive sampling, which is an acceptable attack in research surveies of this sort ( Parahoo, 2006 ) . They show the inclusion standards for their sample “The standard for choice was a senior pupil experience in a infirmary with a multicultural patient population to increase the likeliness that the pupil would see culturally diverse encounters.” ( Reeves and Fogg, 2006 P 173 ) . However, they do non discourse many demographic inside informations of these pupils in relation to sampling.
Cooper Brathwaite ( clearly identifies the sampling method and survey population.
“The mark population consisted of registered nurses who worked in public wellness nursing at a public wellness section in southern Ontario. All RNs were invited to take part in the survey and were included in the survey if they consented to take part and were licensed to pattern in Ontario. RNs on long-run leave of absence or pregnancy leave were excluded. Seventy-six RNs participated in the survey, and this sample size was equal to observe a moderate consequence size with a beta & gt ; .80 and alpha of.05” .
Statistically ciphering the population/sample size in this manner makes the research findings more generalizeable ( McDowell and Newell, 1996 ) .
Berlin et Al ( 2006 ) hardly depict their survey sample, and although demographic characteristics are dealt with rather extensively, the deficiency of item about the sample is a failing of this survey: “The questionnaire was sent to the staying 387 PCHNurses in Stockholm
County and was answered by 270 PCHNurses ( 70 % ) .” ( p 161 ) .
Kardong-Edgren et Al ( 2005 ) clearly define their sample and sample process. They used a convenience sample of nursing Faculty go toing two conferences, one of which was a Latino nurses conference. It appears that this was a calculated move to guarantee an ethnically diverse sample. Although convenience samples are acceptable in qualitative research, this is a quantitative survey, and it would hold been better, possibly, to hold a statistically determined sample. Sargent et Al ( 2005 ) use a statistically determined sample, which lends strength to their survey.
Is the method of informations aggregation auditable? ( Qualitative surveies )
Is the method of informations aggregation valid and dependable ( Quantitative surveies )
Reeves and Fogg ( 2006 ) usage two recognised informations aggregation instruments, as described above, which makes it auditable. Using pre-tested informations aggregation tools such as this can be really utile in guaranting an auditable attack and one which is more dependable, because the instruments have been used before ( Thompson, 2000 ) . However, this writer wonders if there could be any challenges to utilizing the instrument designed in one scene or context for research carried out in a different context. Cooper Brathwaite’s ( 2005 ) informations aggregation tools used a similar attack:
“ The demographic variables were age, degree of instruction, old ages of nursing experience, old ages of public wellness experience, linguistic communication spoken at place, and larning manner, and these were measured with standardised inquiries. The result variable was cultural competency, which was measured on an altered version of the Inventory for Measuring the Procedure of Cultural Competence Among Healthcare Professionals– Revised ( IAPCC-R ; Campinha-Bacote, 2002a ) . Last, unfastened ended inquiries were used to roll up qualitative data.” ( Cooper Brathwaite, 2005 P 365 ) .
Cooper Brathwaite ( 2005 ) used an basically valid attack, every bit long as the Inventory used in these two surveies remains valid and applicable.
Berlin et al’s ( 2006 ) informations aggregation tool is justified in some item and this gives even more cogency to the survey:
“A study-specific questionnaire was designed on the footing of the literature ( 1, 21–24 ) and the author’s cognition and experience. An expert at Statistics Sweden, who focused on replying graduated tables and quantifiability, assessed the questionnaire. Furthermore, five PCHC services experts, working as health care developers in Stockholm County, were asked to see the content, the intelligibility and the relevancy of each inquiry. After some alterations, the concluding questionnaire consisted of a sum of 30 items.” ( p 162 ) .
Questionnaires are widely used in qualitative and quantitative research, but guaranting that they are fit for intent, valid, dependable, and will really function to reply the research inquiries with some cogency, is non so easy ( McColl et al, 2001 ; McDowell and Newell, 1996 ) . The item with which this research instrument has been developed strongly underpins its cogency, but the procedure of concluding alteration as described above still causes the research worker to inquiry if there is any research worker prejudice in the concluding alterations. It would hold further enhanced the credibleness of the research if this procedure had besides been every bit crystalline as the old description.
Kardong-Edgren et Al ( 2005 ) province that “respondents completed the Cultural Attitudes Scale, the Cultural Self-efficacy Scale, and a demographic study and wrote a response to an open-ended question.” ( p 175 ) . Kardong-Edgren et Al ( 2005 ) give a batch of item about their research instruments and these surely seem to be appropriate to the survey purpose, and link straight back to the survey inquiry, and the three chief tools are all derived from old surveies, so all have been antecedently tested. The same is true of Sargent et Al ( 2005 ) .
Is the method of informations analysis believable and verifiable? ( Qualitative Studies )
Is the method of informations analysis valid and dependable? ( Quantitative Studies )
The method of informations analysis is an of import component of qualitative surveies in peculiar, because excessively frequently qualitative informations analysis is described as non being strict or crystalline plenty ( Baker, 2006 ; Dawson, 2002 ; Denscombe, 2002 ) . Reeves and Fogg ( 2006 ) adhered to their chosen methodological analysis and used Leininger’s ( 1990 ) four stages of analysis for qualitative informations were used to analyze the qualitative informations, whilst the quantitative findings from the Inventory were enumerated. No statistical trials were used here, which is appropriate, given the highly little sample size.
The statistical analyses that Cooper Brathwaite ( 2005 ) used were suited for the steps and the survey design. The qualitative analysis was by content analysis, which is a recognized and normally believable signifier of analyzing qualitative textual information ( Moore, 2006 ) . Berlin et Al ( 2006 ) describe and utilize appropriate stastistical trials for their informations analysis, utilizing logistic arrested development analysis, and covering with all variables clearly.
Kardong-Edgren et Al ( 2005 ) have addressed informations analysis every bit comprehensively as the other elements of their survey:
“SPSS for Windows, Version 11 ( Chicago, IL ) , was used for informations analysis. Each survey inquiry was analyzed utilizing descriptive statistics. Correlational and stepwise multiple arrested development analyses evaluated relationships among the variables. Answers to the unfastened ended
inquiry were recorded and grouped by subject and frequence of response.” ( p 177 )
However, this writer would oppugn the attack, because although the statistical trials used are suited for the informations, these statistics remain chiefly descriptive of this survey population, and because this is non a statistically determined representative sample, the ultimate consequences may non be movable to anything other than a similar sample of persons. However, the transparence of their description of the statistical analysis is a strength of this survey. There is besides a brief sum-up of the unfastened ended inquiry responses, with some quotation marks from the information, but at that place could hold been a more elaborate geographic expedition of this component of the survey. As with other surveies, this paper did non province they were utilizing a assorted methods attack, and it would look that the qualitative component is a minor adjunct to the more of import quantitative findings. This writer believes that this may represent a short-sighted attack towards bettering quantitative surveies by adding qualitative dimensions, about as an after-thought. Sargent et Al ( 2005 ) usage appropriate statistical analyses, although their descriptions of these could be hard for the novitiate research worker or pupil to understand.
Are the consequences presented in a manner that is appropriate and clear?
Reeves and Fogg ( 2006 ) present their quantitative informations in tabular signifier, and their qualitative informations is discussed thematically. These are both acceptable ways of showing informations from this sort of survey ( Dawson, 2002 ) , but the treatment of the subjects is instead heavy and some kind of drumhead tabular array of subjects and constructs here might hold made the informations more accessible. Reeves and Fogg ( 2006 ) quotation mark from the textual information extensively, which aids transparence and dependability ( Gerrish and Lacey, 2006 ) .
Cooper Brathwaite ( 2005 ) presents the quantitative informations by consequences and statistical analysis, in graphical and tabular signifier, showing the descriptive statistics and categorical variables, and the qualitative information is discussed in the text, with some, albeit brief, quotes from the textual information. Again, the qualitative informations consequences are instead heavy and might hold benefited from some sort of graphical representation of the subjects and their relationships. Berlin et Al ( 2006 ) present multiple tabular representations of informations with all elements of the statistics clearly outlined, assurance intervals and odds ratios indicated, and good transparence. However, this instrument besides included unfastened ended inquiries, which are non dealt with in any item in the presentation of the consequences, with merely one drumhead inquiry turn toing this component of the survey:
“In answer to the open-ended inquiries, the PCHNurses suggested that their working environment could be improved with better duologues and interaction during their communicating with parents of foreign origin.” ( Berlin et al, 2006 P 165 ) .
This writer feels that this component of the survey should hold at least been described in some farther item, with some illustrations of responses cited here, as there is no transparence here.
Kardong-Edgren et Al ( 2005 ) present their consequences in tabular and textual signifier, and these are moderately accessible, although more item about the subjects of the qualitative component, possibly besides presented in tabular or graphical signifier, would hold been an betterment. Sargent et Al ( 2005 ) show some tabular arraies, but the bulk of their consequences are presented textually, which makes them really heavy and difficult to follow.
All of these surveies demonstrate the benefits of utilizing tabular arraies and graphs to stand for and summarize informations, to do it more accessible to the reader.
Is the treatment comprehensive?
In the Reeves and Fogg ( 2006 ) article, it is apparent that the writers have covered a figure of issues emerging from the informations in relation to cultural competency. They explore in great item significances and constructs from the information, and draw decisions from these findings, although this writer would oppugn whether they could correlate these constructs so steadfastly in a qualitative survey. Cooper Brathwaite’s ( 2005 ) survey provided a really comprehensive and elaborate treatment of the findings from the both weaponries of the survey, and this writer wonders whether this really effectual and across-the-board treatment was made possible by the assorted methods attack.
Berlin et Al ( 2006 ) supply a comprehensive treatment of their findings, and link this really clearly to the progressive theoretical account of cultural competency that they have established, based on bing theoretical accounts. They clearly discuss how their findings indicate the nature of cultural competency within this country of pattern, and all of the treatment is clearly linked to the findings of the survey, although this writer believes that a comparing with a wider scope of literature on cultural competency in nursing would hold enhanced the treatment subdivision.
Kardong-Edgren et Al ( 2005 ) engage in a really critical treatment of their survey, but do non truly discourse their findings at length, and do non discourse them with comparing to any other existing literature. Sargent et Al ( 2005 ) besides provide a good treatment with critical contemplation on the quality of the survey, but merely refers to a little figure of other published plants on the subject, and once more, there is the trust on the dominant theoretical account of cultural competency.
Decisions
The importance, value and significance of cultural competency within nursing pattern is highlighted by some of the chosen surveies. For illustration, Berlin et Al ( 2006 ) have established that cultural consciousness is a requirement for the development of cultural competency, and that cultural competency is a advancement of development, non merely a province of being. They province:
“In this survey PCHNurses’ degree of cultural competency and working conditions were unsatisfactory. They experienced troubles during their interaction with kids and parents of foreign beginning and they felt dissatisfied with the quality of their health care work. These factors can ensue in communicating jobs, and can besides hold an consequence on the PCHNurses’ ability to run into the demands and outlooks of this group of kids and parents. In add-on, it might forestall them from deriving the trust when trying to supply equal wellness care.” ( Berlin et al, 2006, p 167 ) .
This demonstrates that within certain contexts, cultural competency can impact on the quality of healthcare proviso, and on the quality of the patient experience. The survey here is limited by its focal point on one country of pattern, but does propose that for similar countries, a similar significance may be assumed. However, writers repeatedly underline the fact that health care consumers are all entitled to the best criterions of attention, and this includes culturally competent attention ( Sargent et al, 2005 ) .
Reeves and Fogg ( 2006 ) suggest that for their pupils, old life experience has an impact on their ability to present culturally competent attention:
“For pupils with a positive life experience, the exposure to different cultural backgrounds promotes alterations in their cognition, beliefs, and attitudes but is non seen as endangering to them. These pupils likely will hold the cultural desire to work with clients who are culturally diverse. Students with impersonal life forms may be helped to see that larning about cultural diverseness will heighten their nursing pattern. Students with a conflicted life form likely will necessitate extra module aid in detecting ways to decide their struggles and assist them to travel into a transitional alteration that promotes their cultural competence.” ( Reeves and Fogg, 2006 P 177 ) .
This would propose that for nursing pupils to be able to present culturally competent nursing attention, their old life experience is of import and affects their response to their nursing preparation in cultural competency. Therefore, more than merely supplying preparation may be needed. However, Reeves and Fogg’s ( 2006 ) survey was really limited, both in relation to the specificity of the context and the range of the survey. This writer would propose that this survey needs to be replicated in other scenes before nursing programmes are adapted in line with these findings.
Cooper-Brathwaite’s ( 2005 ) survey presented rather clear findings:
“The present findings indicated that a short-run class could be used to develop degrees of cultural competency in PHNs. The participants’ competency did non alter meaningfully anterior to bringing of the class but increased instantly at the completion of the educational sessions” ( p 367 ) .
The findings of this survey suggest that cultural competency, as defined within this survey, and as addressed through the described parametric quantities of the class, would be of important benefit to nurses, and that the sorts of subjects covered in the class did better cultural competence, within the defined model, which was the same model as the old survey. The writer admirations, nevertheless, whether it might be clip to re-test this theoretical account, to re-evaluate it and its currency for the current planetary clime, and to prove it in the visible radiation of current pattern as to how applicable it still is for the modern health care context.
Berlin et Al ( 2004 ) besides argue that cultural competency preparation is an of import portion of nursing pattern and pattern development, demanding established formal and go oning preparation in culturalcompetence for all PCHNurses working in the PCHC services” ( p 167 ) . Kardong-Edgren et Al ( 2005 ) focused specifically on nurse pedagogues, and on their cultural competency, and found that their survey did non back up the thought that nurse instructors are prepared or capable of learning cultural competency. They argue that more research is needed on nurse teachers’ cultural competence, but besides that the course of study for nurse preparation do non truly integrate sufficient focal point on cultural competence ( Kardong-Edgren et Al, 2005 ) .
Sargent et Al ( 2005 ) underpin the primacy of cultural competency in nursing instruction:
“Focusing on cultural competency at each degree of the collegial nursing plan is indispensable. This is presently being done with the incorporation of cultural diverseness and cultural competency in the clinical nursing classs and nonclinical seminar classs throughout the first twelvemonth through 4th twelvemonth levels.” ( p 219 ) .
All of these surveies seem to show that cultural competency can be achieved through instruction, but besides that it is non merely knowledge acquisition, it is about the quality of nursing experiences and exposure to multicultural scenes and client groups.
Decision
It would look from this reappraisal of the literature that nurses do necessitate cultural competency, and that this cultural competency demands to be developed and even learned. Cultural competency is now viewed as a necessary portion of nursing attention, and because of this, it is believed that it should organize portion of nursing course of study. “Culturally competent wellness attention needs to be included in the course of study, and pupils need to be given every chance possible to run into this goal.” ( Reeves and Fogg, 2006 P 172 ) .
The writer found that the bulk of surveies were of mean quality, but that some seemed to mostly overlook ethical issues, and did non turn to the methodological context and the philosophical orientation of the research and how this either strengthened or limited their surveies. More, good quality qualitative research surveies in this country might be utile. The surveies tended to trust on antecedently developed instruments and theoretical accounts of cultural competency, and this writer would reason that it might be clip to update and reexamine these theoretical accounts in the visible radiation of the current planetary context.
All of the primary research surveies critiqued in this reappraisal were comparatively recent, and seem to propose that cultural competency is of international concern to nursing and to nurse instruction in peculiar, but that the current province of cultural competency is missing. Cultural competency cognition, accomplishment and application is non apparent in the bulk of surveies, and the recommendations are repeatedly focused on bettering cultural competency, bettering the cognition base, and implementing better instruction, preparation and pattern in relation to cultural competency. This would propose that non merely is at that place a demand for research into cultural competency, but that theoretical accounts of cultural competency must be developed for single locations or geographical countries, because of the nature of each country. It might be a extremist proposition, but this writer would propose that if every health care Trust and/or nurse developing establishment were to transport out an geographic expedition of cultural competency, and implement cultural competency preparation, and measure this preparation, this might turn to the issue and really get down to right the balance so that the nursing profession can supply true, patient-centred attention.
Overall, the surveies do demo that nurses need cultural competency, but that they do non possess sufficient cultural competency, and that educational plans and developing in this country is cardinal to them developing this cognition and accomplishment. The deductions for this are important in footings of instruction, preparation of qualified staff, and the resources required for this.
Mentions
Alexander, G.R. ( 2008 ) Cultural Competence Models in NursingCritical Care Nursing Clinics of North America20 ( 4 ) 415-421
Baker, L. ( 2006 ) Ten common booby traps to avoid when carry oning qualitative research.British Journal of Midwifery14 ( 9 ) 530-531.
Beach, M.C. , Price, E.G. , Gary, T.L. et Al ( 2005 ) Cultural Competence: A Systematic Review of Health Care Provider Educational Interventions.Medical Care.43 ( 4 ) :356-373,
Beach, M.C. , Saha, S. and Cooper, L.A. ( 2006 ) The function and relationship of cultural competency and patient-centredness in wellness attention quality. Available from www.cmwf.org. Accessed 23-11-08.
Benkert, R. , Tanner, C. , Guthrie, B. et Al ( 2005 ) Cultural competency of nurse practician pupils: a pool ‘s experience.Journal of Nurse Education44 ( 5 ) :225-33.
Bentley, R. and Eillison, K.J. ( 2007 ) Increasing Cultural Competence in Nursing through International Service-Learning Experiences.Nurse Educator.32 ( 5 ) :207-211, .
Berlin, A. , Johansson, S-E. and Tornkvist, L. ( 2006 ) Working conditions and cultural competency when interacting with kids and parents of foreign origin – Primary Child Health Nurses’ sentiments.Norse Journal of Caring Sciences20 160-168.
Bowling, A. ( 2002 )Research Methods in Health2neodymiumEd. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Caffrey, R.A. , Neander, W. , Markle, D. and Stewart, B. ( 2005 ) Bettering the cultural competency of nursing pupils: consequences of incorporating cultural content in the course of study and an international submergence experience.Journal of Nurse Education44 ( 5 ) :234-40.
Caldwell K. , Henshaw L. , Taylor G. ( 2005 ) Developing a model for reviewing wellness research.Journal of Health, Social and Environmental Issues6 ( 1 ) 45-53
Campinha-Bacote, J. ( 2007 ) The Quest for Cultural Competence in Nursing Care
Nursing Forum30 ( 4 ) 19–25
Campinha-Bacote, J. ( 2002 ) The procedure of cultural competency in the bringing of health care services: a theoretical account of attention.Journal of Transcultural Nursing13 181.
Chenoweth, M.I, Jeon, Y-H. , Goff, M. and Burke, C. ( 2006 ) Cultural competence and nursing attention: an Australian position.International Nursing Review53 34-40.
Collins, S.D. ( ) Is cultural competence required in today’s nursing attention. Available from www.nsna.org Accessed 23-11-08.
Cooper, T. ( 2006 ) Research ethics commission blessing: the good, the bad and the ugly.British Journal of Midwifery14 ( 7 ) 439-440.
Cooper Brathwaite, A. ( 2006 ) “ Influence of Nurse Characteristics on the Acquisition of Cultural Competence, ” International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship: 3 ( 1 ) Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.bepress.com/ijnes/vol3/iss1/art3 Accessed 23-11-08.
Cooper Brathwaite, A. and Majumdar, B. ( 2006 ) Evaluation of a cultural competency educational programme.Journal of Advanced Nursing53 ( 4 ) 470-479.
Cooper Brathwaite, A. ( 2005 ) Evaluation of a cultural competency class.Journal of Transcultural Nursing16 361.
Cowan, D.T. and Norman, I. ( 2006 ) Cultural competency in nursing: new significances.Journal of Transcultural Nursing17 82-88.
Dawson, C. ( 2002) Practical research methods: a user-friendly usher to get the hanging research techniques and undertakingsOxford: How To Books.
Denscome, M. ( 2002 )Land regulations for good researchHymen: Open University Press.
Declaration of Helsinki ( 1964 ) Available from: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.cirp.org/library/ethics/helsinki/ . Accessed 30-11-08.
Douglas, M. and Lipson, J.G. ( 2008 ) Transcultural nursing: the planetary docket.Contemporary Nurse29 162-164.
Doutrich, D. and Storey, M. ( 2004 ) Competence in Public Health.
Family & A ; Community Health. Education and Practice:27 ( 4 ) :298-307.
Dreher, M. ( 2002 ) Cultural competency in nursing: foundation or false belief?Nursing Mentality50 181-186.
Easton, K, McComish, J.F. , & A ; Greenberg, R. ( 2000 ) . Avoiding common booby traps in qualitative informations aggregation and written text.Qualitative Health Research10 ( 3 ) 705-707.
Evans, B.C. and Greenberg, E. ( 2006 ) Atmosphere, tolerance and cultural competency in a Baccalaureate nursing plan: results of a nursing work force diverseness grant.Journal of Transcultural Nursing17 298.
Gerrish, K. & A ; Lacey, A. ( explosive detection systems ) ( 2006 )The Research Process in Nursing, 5th edition Oxford: Blackwell Science.
Gillham, W.E. ( 2000 )Developing a questionnaireLondon: Continuum.
Grix, J. ( 2004 )The Foundations of ResearchBasingstoke: Palgrave.
Gustafson, D.L. ( 2005 ) Transcultural nursing theory from a critical cultural position.Progresss in Nursing Science28 ( 1 ) :2-16
Holliday, A. ( 2002 )Making and Writing Qualitative ResearchLondon: Sage Publications.
Kardong-Edgren, S. and Campinha-Bacote, J. ( 2008 ) Cultural competence of graduating US Bachelor of Science nursing pupilsContemporary Nurse28 ( 1-2 ) 37-44
Kardong-Edgren, S. , Bond, M.L. , Schlosser, S. et Al ( 2005 ) Cultural attitudes, cognition, and accomplishments of nursing module toward patients from four diverse civilizations.Journal of Professional Nursing21 ( 3 ) 175-182.
Kearney, M.H. ( 2001 ) “Levels and Applications of Qualitative Research Evidence.”Research in Nursing and Health24 145-153
Krainovich-Miller, B. , Yost, J.M. , Norman, R.G. et Al ( 2008 ) Measuring cultural consciousness of nursing pupils: a first measure toward cultural competence.Journal of Transcultural Nursing19 250.
Kulwicki, A. and Boloink, B.J. ( 1996 ) Appraisal of degree of comfort in supplying multicultural nursing attention by baccalaureate nursing pupils.Journal of Cultural Diversity3 ( 2 ) :40-5.
Johnson, R.B. , and Onwuegbuzie, A.J. ( 2004 ) Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come. Educational Researcher 33 ( 7 ) 14-16.
McColl, E. , Jacoby, A. , Thomas, L. et Al ( 2001 ) Design and usage of questionnaires: a reappraisal of best pattern applicable to studies of wellness service staff and patients.Health Technology Assessment5 ( 31 ) 1-4.
McDowell, I. and Newell, C. ( 1996 )Measuring wellness: a usher to evaluation graduated tables and questionnaires. 2neodymiumEd. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mahoney, J.S. , Carlson, E. and Engebretson, J.C. ( 2006 ) A model for cultural competency in advanced pattern psychiatric and mental wellness instruction.Positions in Psychiatric Care42 ( 4 )
MNRS ( 2007 ) Factors Associated With Cultural Competence in a Random Sample of Nurse Practitioners. Available from: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.nursinglibrary.org/Portal/main.aspx? pageid=4024 & A ; pid=13089
Accessed 23-11-08.
Moore, N. ( 2006 )How To Make Research( 3rderectile dysfunction ) . London: Facet Publishing.
Napholz, L. ( 1999 ) A comparing of self-reported cultural competence accomplishments among two groups of nursing pupils: deductions for nursing instruction.Journal of Nurse Education38 ( 2 ) :81-3.
Narayanasamy, A. and White, E. ( 2005 ) A reappraisal of transcultural nursing.Nurse Education Today25 102-111.
Narayanasamy, A. ( 2003 ) Transcultural nursing: how do nurses react to cultural demands? British Journal of Nursing, 12 ( 3 ) 185 – 194
Nokes, K.M. , Nickitas, D.M. , Keida, R. and Neville, S. ( 2004 ) Does service-learning increase cultural competence, critical thought, and civic battle?Journal of Nurse Education44 ( 2 ) :65-70.
Nuremburg Code ( 1949 ) Available from: hypertext transfer protocol: //ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/nuremberg.html Accessed 30-11-0 8.
Oppenheim, A. N. ( 1992 ) Questionnaire Designs Interviewing and Attitude Measurements in Cohen, L. , Mansion, L. & A ; Morrison, K. ( 2000 )Research Methods In instruction,5ThursdayEdition. London, Routledge-Falmer.
O’Shaughnessy, D.F. and Tilki, M. ( 2007 ) Cultural competence in physical therapy: a theoretical account for preparation.Physical therapy93 69-77.
Parahoo, K. ( 2006 )Nursing Research: Principles, Process and Issues.Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Polit, D.F. and Hungler, B.P. ( 1995 )Nursing Research: Principles and Methods.( 6Thursdayed. ) Phil