In recent old ages, contemplation has doubtless become an of import construct in nursing, exciting argument and influencing nursing pattern and instruction around the universe. Much has been written about the theory of contemplation, the bulk of which has been applied to the educational scene ( Price 2004 ) . However, the procedure of reflecting has been described as a transferable accomplishment which may be incorporated into clinical pattern, enabling practicians to better understand themselves and others, and work out jobs ( Mantzoukas & A ; Jasper 2004 ) . Indeed, the capableness to reflect consciously upon one ‘s professional pattern is by and large considered of import for the development of instruction and, therefore, for clinical expertness ( Mamede & A ; Schmidt 2004 ) .
Reid ( 1993 ) defines contemplation as ‘a procedure of reexamining an experience of pattern in order to depict, analyse, evaluate and so inform acquisition about pattern ‘ ( Reid 1993, p. 305 ) . The nursing profession seems to recommend the demand for nurses to be educated and pattern in ways that develop their critical thought, liberty and sensitiveness to others ( Reed & A ; Ground 1997 ) . Bulman ( 2004 ) contends that brooding pattern may supply a agency of accomplishing this. Within an intensive attention scene, some grounds exists to propose a strong relationship between lived experience and acquisition, with most critical attention practicians larning from old experience ( Hendricks et al 1996 ) . More late, contemplation has been closely associated with the constructs of critical thought and deconstruction. It is argued that a combination of these rules create a retrospective and prospective dimension, giving the practician the ability to deconstruct events, to ground the beginnings of state of affairss, and to see what has gone earlier and what may go on yet ( Rolfe 2005 ) .
In order to be effectual in pattern there is a demand to be purposeful and end directed. It is suggested therefore that contemplation can non merely be concerned with understanding, but must besides concentrate on turn uping pattern within its ‘ societal constructions, and on altering pattern ( Bolton 2001 ) . This suggests that a structured attack to contemplation is of benefit to the practician. Indeed the usage of a theoretical account or model of contemplation is advocated as a tool which can help and ease the practician in contemplation, advancing a procedure of uninterrupted development ( Bulman 2004 ) .
Contemplation is seen as a dynamic procedure and non a inactive 1 ( Duke 2004 ) , and therefore the usage of a model which adopts a cyclic attack to reflective pattern seems appropriate. One such model is Gibbs ‘ ( 1988 ) Reflective Cycle, which is adapted signifier a model of experiential acquisition, and uses a series of inquiries to steer, and supply construction for the practician when reflecting on an experience. Gibbs ( 1988 ) high spots 6 of import countries of consideration when reflecting on a specific state of affairs, promoting the practician to see what happened, why it happened and what could be done otherwise in the hereafter. The 6 constituents of the Brooding Cycle are outlined below:
Description – What happened?
Feelingss – What were you believing and feeling?
Evaluation – What was good and bad about the state of affairs?
Analysis – What sense can you do of the state of affairs?
Conclusion – What else could you hold done?
Action Plan – If the state of affairs arose once more, what would you make?
It is clear that the thought of brooding pattern has come to hold a considerable impact on the nursing profession. This paper will concentrate on 2 clinical scenarios happening within an intensive attention puting. The issues raised will be discussed within the context of Gibbs ‘ ( 1988 ) Brooding Cycle. The purpose in making so is to foreground the benefits of a structured brooding procedure, and to place ways in which clinical pattern may be improved in the hereafter.
Scenario 1
Description
The first scenario concerns the attention of an aged, critically sick patient, who was being treated in a surgical intensive attention unit. At the clip of this scenario the patient had been in intensive attention for about 3 hebdomads, holding been admitted with respiratory failure necessitating cannulation, and exposing clinical symptoms consistent with sepsis. The patient had many other underlying medical jobs, was morbidly corpulent, and despite antibiotic therapy was necessitating high degrees of inotropic and ventilatory support. Despite the patients ‘ symptoms, no definite beginning of sepsis had been identified.
The above patient was being cared for by the writer on a 12 hr twenty-four hours displacement and at the forenoon ward unit of ammunition it was noted that the patients ‘ status had deteriorated significantly over the old 2 yearss, with increased inotrope dependance and declining nephritic map. With few intervention options left to seek, the adviser anesthesiologist decided that the patient should hold a CT scan to place or govern out an abdominal job as a beginning of the sepsis. The patient was reviewed by a adviser sawbones who felt that in position of the patients ‘ co-morbidity, surgery of any sort would non be appropriate, despite possible positive findings on CT.
Knowing that a CT scan had been carried out 1 hebdomad antecedently with no important findings, the writer raised concerns about the benefit of such a process, and suggested that at the really least the patient ‘s household should be informed or consulted about the planned probe. The patient ‘s boy had been spoken to the old twenty-four hours and informed that the forecast was really hapless. Withdrawal of intervention had been mentioned as a possibility in the event of no betterment in the patient ‘s status. The boy nevertheless was non informed about the scan which went in front the same twenty-four hours.
Transfering the patient to the radiology section for scan proved hard. The patient was sedated for transportation ensuing in a demand for increased inotropes due to farther hypotension caused by the sedation. The patients ‘ big size besides created a job in happening an appropriate transportation streetcar to take the patients ‘ weight. Again the writer voiced concerns, saying that possibly reassign was unadvisable in position of the patients ‘ unstable cardiovascular position. The anesthesiologist decided that we should continue with the scan.
The patient remained unstable throughout the transportation, necessitating a farther addition in inotropes on reaching at scan. Whilst on the CT tabular array, the patient became perilously hypotensive and bradycardic, and it seemed that cardiac apprehension was at hand. Adrenaline boluses were administered, and big fluid boluses of gelofusine were besides given. In position of this, the CT scan was abandoned halfway, and the patient was rapidly transferred back to ICU. Further epinephrine boluses were needed during transportation.
On reaching back to ICU, the writer was met by the patient ‘s boy, who was non cognizant that the patient was being scanned. He was made aware of the patients ‘ hapless status. Back in ICU it was decided that farther resuscitation was non appropriate. The boy was present when the patient died a few proceedingss subsequently.
Feelingss
On the twenty-four hours these events took topographic point, the prevailing ideas and feelings of the writer were 1s of guilt and insufficiency. Having considered the multiple wellness jobs faced by the patient at this clip, the writer felt that the procedure of reassigning the patient to CT scan and transporting out the scan itself may do the patient emphasis, uncomfortableness and possible danger, and finally be of small or no benefit.
During the transportation and scanning procedure, the writer became progressively dying about the immediate safety of the patient, and the potency for impairment in the patients ‘ status. When the patient became perilously bradycardic and hypotensive, the writers ‘ ideas were concentrated on seeking to forestall cardiac apprehension.
On returning to ICU and run intoing the patients ‘ boy, it seemed that neither the self-respect of the patient or the concerns of the household had been respected. The writer felt an insufficiency and felt that the involvements of the patient had non been decently advocated. The patient passed off in a distressing and undignified mode, and the boy did non hold the chance to pass personal clip with the patient prior to this occurrence. The writer felt guilty, as it seemed that the CT scan should non hold happened and that the undignified fortunes environing the patients ‘ decease demand non hold occurred.
Evaluation
Looking back on the events of scenario 1, it seems that there were both positive and negative facets to the experience. During transportation to CT scan and the exigency state of affairs which followed, the writer felt that there was good teamwork between the different professionals involved in the attention of the patient. Because of this, prompt action was taken, forestalling cardiac apprehension.
However, it seems that this state of affairs may hold been avoided, which in bend raises many inquiries associating to the attention of the patient. Ethically, one must oppugn how appropriate it was to scan a badly infected, unstable patient, particularly when disciplinary interventions would hold been inappropriate in the event of an abnormalcy being discovered. Should the writer have advocated the involvements of the patient and household more forcefully? Was there a deficiency of communicating and consensus between the critical attention squad? The events of this incident culminated in a clinical exigency state of affairs which led to the patients ‘ decease. Therefore, the writer feels that the patients ‘ clinical status and the ethical issues and quandary environing the patients ‘ attention must be examined and discussed, in the hope that lessons can be learned through the brooding procedure.
Analysis
Sepsis
Most unwellness and decease in patients in intensive attention is caused by the effects of sepsis and systemic redness. Indeed, sepsis affects 18 million people worldwide each twelvemonth ( Slade et al 2003 ) , with terrible sepsis staying the highest cause of decease in patients admitted to non-coronary intensive attention units ( Edbrooke et al 1999 ) . Sepsis is a complex status that consequences from an infective procedure, and is the organic structure ‘s response to infection. It involves systemic inflammatory and cellular events that result in altered circulation and curdling, endothelial disfunction, and impaired tissue perfusion ( Kleinpell 2004 ) .
Dellinger et Al ( 2004 ) define sepsis as the systemic response to infection manifested by 2 or more of the followers:
High or low temperature ( & gt ; 38A°C or & lt ; 36A°C )
Heart rate & gt ; 90 beats per minute
Respiratory rate & gt ; 20 breaths per minute or PaCO2 & lt ; 4.3kPa
High or low white blood cell count ( & gt ; 12,000 or & lt ; 4,000 )
In terrible sepsis impaired tissue perfusion along with micro vascular curdling can take to multiple organ system disfunction, which is a major cause of sepsis-related mortality ( Robson & A ; Newell 2005 ) . While all variety meats are prone to failure in sepsis, pneumonic, cardiovascular, and nephritic disfunction occur most normally ( Hotchkiss & A ; Karl 2003 ) . When multiple organ system disfunction occurs, Dolan ( 2003 ) promotes evidence-based sepsis intervention whereby patients should have targeted organ support. This includes mechanical airing, nephritic replacing therapy, fluids, vasopressor or inotropic disposal, and blood merchandise disposal, to maximise perfusion and oxygenation.
In recent old ages new therapies have emerged which have been shown, in some instances, to increase the opportunity of endurance from terrible sepsis. Recombinant human activated protein C has been shown to hold anti-inflammatory, anti-thrombotic and pro-fibrinolytic belongingss ( Dolan 2003 ) . In a randomized controlled test, Bernard et Al ( 2001 ) found a important decrease in the mortality of infected patients who had been treated with activated protein C. The National Institute for clinical excellence ( 2004 ) now recommends this intervention for grownup patients who have severe sepsis ensuing in multiple organ failure, and who are being provided with optimum ICU support. Steroids, the usage of which in ICU has long been debated, have besides been shown, in low doses, to cut down the hazard of decease in some patients in infected daze ( Annane 2000 ) .
Despite the development of specific interventions to disrupt or command the inflammatory and procoagulant procedure associated with sepsis, its direction remains a major challenge in health care ( Kleinpell 2004 ) . The patient in scenario 1 was clearly in a province of terrible sepsis, with respiratory, cardiac and nephritic failure, and having some of the supportive interventions mentioned above. Indeed it seems that the badness of this status should non hold been underestimated. In position of this, the ethical issues environing the determination to take this patient to CT scan must now be considered.
Ethical Dilemmas and Consensus
Ethical issues have emerged in recent old ages as a major constituent of wellness attention for critically sick patients ( Friedman 2001 ) . Therefore, caring for these patients in an intensive attention puting necessitates that hard ethical jobs must be faced and resolved ( Fisher 2004 ) . Traditionally, much of the literature in biomedical moralss comes from theoretical positions that include principled moralss, caring moralss and virtuousness moralss ( Bunch 2002 ) . Although these positions provide an ethical consciousness, which can be helpful, they do non of necessity give much way for clinical pattern. Melia ( 2001 ) supports this impression, proposing that many treatments of ethical issues in wellness attention are presented from a moral philosophical point of view, which as a effect leaves out the clinical and societal context in which determinations are taken and carried through.
Beauchamp & A ; Childress ( 1994 ) place 5 rules pertinent to determination devising in intensive attention. These are: salvageability, life saving, non-maleficence, beneficence, and justness. Ethical quandary occur when two or more of the above rules come into struggle. The rules of beneficence ( making good ) , non-maleficence ( making no injury ) and justness ( just intervention ) are good established within the field of bioethics. Within a critical attention context nevertheless, the quandary between salvageability and life saving becomes an of import focal point for wellness attention professionals. Indeed, Prien & A ; Van Aken ( 1999 ) raise the inquiry of whether all medical agencies to continue life have to be employed under all fortunes, or are there state of affairss in which we should non make everything that it is possible to make. This inquiry becomes peculiarly relevant when a patients ‘ status does non better but instead deteriorates increasingly. Curtin ( 2005 ) suggests that at some point in the class of intervention, the line between handling a curable disease and prolonging an unpreventable decease can be crossed. In such incidences Prien & A ; Van Aken ( 1999 ) place a transitional zone between the effort to handle the patient, and the protraction of deceasing, in which a struggle between the rules of life saving and non-maleficence develops.
These constructs seem peculiarly relevant to scenario 1 where the involvements of the patient may hold been neglected in favor of farther efforts to handle the patients ‘ status. This, in bend created a struggle between the rules of salvageability and life saving. The determination to execute a CT scan on a patient with such cardiovascular instability and a really hapless forecast, meant that the patient was subjected to dangers and injuries when there were few, if any benefits to warrant this. Hence, the struggle between the ethical rules was non resolved, and the professional responsibility of non-maleficence toward the patient was non respected.
Such struggles and quandary in intensive attention can be made all the harder by the handiness of advanced engineerings. Callahan ( 2003 ) writes that one of the most seductive powers of medical engineering is to confound the usage of engineering with a regard for the holiness of life. In add-on, Fisher ( 2004 ) contends that it has become all excessively easy to believe that if one respects the value of life, and engineering has the power to widen life, so a failure to utilize it is a failure to esteem that value. This is peculiarly true of diagnostic engineerings ( such as CT scanning ) which must be used with cautiousness, particularly in instances where the diagnostic information will do small or no difference to the intervention of the patient, but can make or rise anxiousness and uncomfortableness for the patient ( Callahan 2003 ) . Medical engineering is a two-edged blade, capable of salvaging and bettering life but besides of stoping and harming life ( Curtin 2005 ) . Good critical attention medical specialty carries the duty of continuing life, on the one manus, and doing possible a peaceable decease, on the other. Callahan ( 2003 ) concludes by warning that any automatic prejudice in favor of utilizing engineering will endanger that latter possibility.
Consensus between members of the intensive attention squad is besides highlighted as an of import issue in ethical determination devising. Effective communicating and coaction among medical and nursing staff are indispensable for high quality wellness attention ( Woodrow 2000 ) . Collaboration can be seen as ‘working together, sharing duty for work outing jobs, and doing determinations to explicate and put to death programs for patient attention ‘ ( Gedney 2000 p.41 ) . In intensive attention units where ethical jobs are faced often, attention has to be a squad attempt ( Fisher 2004 ) .
In a qualitative survey, Melia ( 2001 ) found that there was a strong desire within the intensive attention squad that ethical and moral consensus should be achieved in the involvements of good patient attention, even though it was recognised that there is no legal demand for nurses to hold with ICU determinations. Cobaoglu & A ; Algier ( 2004 ) nevertheless, found that the same ethical quandary was perceived otherwise by trefoils and nurses with the differences being related to the infirmaries ‘ hierarchal construction and the traditional differentiations between the two professions. Similarly, it has been observed that differences between physicians and nurses in ethical quandary were a map of the professional function played by each, instead than differences in ethical logical thinking or moral motive ( Oberle & A ; Hughes 2001 ) .
It seems therefore that while the medical and nursing professions portion the same purposes for patient results, the thoughts environing how these results should be achieved may differ ( Fisher 2004 ) . These differences have contributed to the development of the construct of the nurse as patient advocator, which sees protagonism as a cardinal and built-in function in the lovingness relationship, and non merely as a individual constituent of attention ( Snowball 1996 ) . The function of the nurse advocator should be that of go-between and facilitator, negociating between the different wellness and illness positions of patient, physician, and other wellness attention professionals on the patients ‘ behalf ( Mallik 1998 ) .
Empirical grounds is thin and philosophical statements seem to rule in the field of patient protagonism. There is some grounds to propose that nurse protagonism has had good results for the patient and household in critical attention countries ( Washington 2001 ) . Hewitt ( 2002 ) nevertheless found that humanistic statements that promote protagonism as a moral jussive mood are obliging. Benner ( 1984 ) writes of protagonism within the context of ‘being with a patient in such a manner that acknowledges your shared humanity, which is the base of nursing as a lovingness pattern ‘ ( Benner 1984, p. 28 ) . It has been argued that protagonism, at least in a philosophical sense, is the foundation of nursing itself and as such should be regarded as an issue of great importance by all practicians ( Snowball 1996 ) .
Decision
It can be concluded that sepsis in a critical attention environment is a complex status with a high mortality rate, necessitating extremely specialised interventions. As such, the ethical issues and quandary faced by wellness attention staff caring for a infected patient can be both complex and far making. It must be noted, that there can be no general solutions for such ethical struggles ; each clinical instance must be evaluated separately with all its associated fortunes.
A survey of ethical rules would propose that it is of import that the benefits of a specific intervention or process are established prior to execution, and that these benefits outweigh any possible injuries or hazards to the patient. The ultimate determination shaper in the scenario under treatment was the adviser anesthesiologist, who should hold provided a clearer principle for executing a CT scan on such an unstable patient. As the nurse lovingness for the patient, the writer recognises that the concluding determination sing intervention rested with the anesthesiologist. However, the writer could hold challenged the anesthesiologists ‘ determination further, recommending the patients ‘ involvements, with the purpose of making a moral consensus within the squad. Possibly so the result would hold been more favorable for all concerned.
Action Plan
By reflecting on this scenario, the writer has gained an apprehension of sepsis and the possible ethical jobs which may be encountered when caring for a infected or critically sick patient. As a consequence, the writer feels more confident to dispute those determinations made associating to intervention, which do non look to be in the best involvement of the patient, or which have the possible to do more injury than good. The writer now has a greater apprehension of the professional duty to recommend on a patients ‘ behalf, with the purpose of safeguarding against possible dangers. It is hoped that this will ensue in improved results for patients in the writers ‘ attention.
Scenario 2
Description
This incident occurred in a surgical intensive attention unit while the writer was looking after a ventilated patient who had undergone a laparotomy and right sided hemi-colectomy 2 yearss antecedently. Around 10.30am the patient was reviewed by medical staff and was found to be awake and watchful with good arterial blood gases, and necessitating minimum ventilatory support. In position of this, it was decided that the patients ‘ support should be reduced farther, and supplying this decrease was tolerated, that the patient should be extubated subsequently in the forenoon.
In the intensive attention unit in which the writer works an intensive insulin extract protocol is used ( see Appendix A ) . This is a research based protocol which aims to normalise blood glucose degrees and therefore better clinical results for critically sick patients. All patients on this protocol require either to be absorbing enteric provender at a‰?30ml/hr, on TPN or on 5 % dextroglucose at 100ml/hr ( Appendix A, note 2 ) . The patient involved in this incident was having enteric provender via a naso-gastric tubing, and was on an insulin extract which was running at 4 U/hr. When it was decided that the patient was to be extubated, the writer stopped the enteric provender as a safeguard, to forestall possible aspiration during or after extubation. The writer nevertheless did non halt the insulin extract which breached the protocol guidelines.
About 12 midday the patients ‘ blood gases showed that the decrease in support had been tolerated, and so the patient was extubated. Shortly after this the writer was asked to travel for tiffin interruption and so passed on to a co-worker that the patient had late been extubated but was pull offing good on face mask O. Returning from tiffin 45 proceedingss subsequently, the writer found the patient to be disorientated and somewhat confused. With good O impregnations, the writer doubted that the confusion had resulted from hypoxia or declining blood gases. The writer so realised that the insulin extract had non been stopped with the enteric provender earlier. A cheque of the patients ‘ blood glucose degree showed that it was 1.2mmol/L. The writer instantly stopped the insulin extract, administered 20mls of 50 % dextrose intravenously, as per protocol, and recommenced the enteric provender. Twenty proceedingss subsequently, the patients ‘ blood glucose degree had risen to 3.7mmol/L. The patient continued on the insulin protocol keeping blood glucose degrees within an equal scope. There were no permanent inauspicious effects ensuing from the hypoglycemic episode.
Feelingss
When it was realised that the insulin extract had non been stopped, the writer felt a sense of terror, expecting right that the patients ‘ blood glucose degree would be perilously low. Ideas so became concentrated on raising the blood glucose degree, to guarantee that no farther injury would come to the patient as a consequence of the writers ‘ error.
Following the incident, when the patients ‘ glucose degrees had risen, feelings of guilt were outstanding. At this point the writer realised how much worse the result could hold been for the patient. The writer felt unqualified, cognizing that the patient could hold been much more badly affected, or could even hold died as the consequence of such a simple error.
Evaluation
The events of scenario 2 highlight the fact that clinical mistakes, while easy made, can hold potentially black effects. This is particularly true of those mistakes which involve the disposal of drugs intravenously. In the involvement of patient safety, it is of import that all such mistakes are avoided.
The clinical mistake outlined supra could easy hold been avoided. It seems that there was non sufficient consciousness, on the writers ‘ portion, of the insulin extract protocol and the guidelines refering the disposal of insulin. As a consequence, the insulin protocol was non adhered to. The undermentioned analysis hence will concentrate on the importance of insulin therapy in critical attention countries, and will see the safety issues environing endovenous drug disposal.
Analysis
Blood Glucose Control in Intensive Care
It is good documented that critically sick patients who require drawn-out intensive attention intervention are at high hazard of multiple organ failure and decease ( Diringer 2005 ) . Extensive research over the last decennary has focused on schemes to forestall or change by reversal multiple organ failure, merely a few of which have revealed positive consequences. One of these schemes is tight blood glucose control with insulin ( Khoury et al 2004 ) . It is good known that any type of acute unwellness or hurt consequences in insulin opposition, glucose intolerance and hyperglycemia, a configuration which has been termed the ‘diabetes of emphasis ‘ ( McCowen et al 2001 ) . In critically sick patients, the badness of this status has been shown to reflect the hazard of decease ( Laird et al 2004 ) .
Much has been learned late about the negative predictive effects of hyperglycaemia in critically sick patients. Hyperglycaemia adversely affects unstable balance, sensitivity to infection, morbidity following acute cardiovascular events, and can increase the hazard of nephritic failure, neuropathy and mortality in ICU patients ( DiNardo et al 2004 ) .
Research suggests that there are distinguishable benefits of insulin therapy in bettering clinical results. Such benefits have been seen in patients following acute myocardial infarction, and in the healing of sternal lesions in patients who have had cardiac surgery ( Malmberg 1997 ; Furnary et Al 1999 ) . More late Van lair Berghe et Al ( 2001 ) conducted a big, randomized, controlled survey affecting grownups admitted to a surgical intensive attention unit who were having mechanical airing. The survey demonstrated that standardization of blood glucose degrees utilizing an intensive insulin extract protocol improved clinical results in critically sick patients. In peculiar, intensive insulin therapy was shown to cut down ICU mortality by 42 % , and significantly cut down the incidences of blood poisoning, acute nephritic failure, prolonged ventilatory support, and critical unwellness polyneuropathy. The length of stay in intensive attention was besides significantly shorter for patients on the protocol.
It is ill-defined as to why improved glycaemic control has been associated with improved results in several clinical scenes. Coursin and Murray ( 2003 ) have summarized several taking hypotheses including care of macrophage and neutrophil map, sweetening of erythropoiesis, and the direct anabolic consequence of insulin on respiratory musculuss. The possible anti-inflammatory effects of insulin have besides been evaluated ( Das 2001 ) . There is besides uncertainness over whether it is the existent insulin dosage received per Se, or the grade of normoglycaemia achieved that is responsible for the good effects of intensive glycaemic direction. Van den Berghe ( 2003 ) analysed the informations derived from their 2001 survey and have concluded that the grade of glycaemic control, instead the measure of insulin administered was associated with the lessening in mortality and organ system disfunction.
In a follow up to Van lair Berghe et Al ‘s 2001 survey, Langouche et Al ( 2005 ) found that a important portion of the improved patient results were explained by the effects of intensive insulin on vascular endothelium. The vascular endothelium controls vasomotor tone and micro-vascular flow, and regulates trafficking of foods and several biologically active molecules ( Aird 2003 ) . Langouche et Al ( 2005 ) conclude that keeping normoglycaemia with intensive insulin therapy during critical unwellness protects the vascular endothelium and thereby contributes to the bar of organ failure and decease.
Whatever the grounds for improved patient results, the survey by Van den Burghe et Al ( 2001 ) has prompted much research in this field, all of which has yielded similar consequences. In a similar survey, Krinsley ( 2004 ) found that the usage of an insulin protocol resulted in significantly improved glycaemic control and was associated with reduced mortality, organ disfunction, and length of stay in the ICU in a heterogenous population of critically sick grownup patients. Thus it seems that with the strength of the emerging informations in support of a more intensive attack to glycaemic direction, insulin extracts are being utilised with increasing frequence, and are considered by many to be the criterion of attention for critically sick patients ( DiNardo et al 2004 ) .
It is of import to observe that a good recognised hazard of intensive glucose direction is hypoglycaemia. Indeed Goldberg et Al ( 2004 ) emphasise that in the ICU scene where patients frequently can non describe or react to symptoms, the potency for hypoglycemia is of peculiar concern. The events of scenario 2 highlight the writers ‘ mistake in the disposal of insulin ensuing in hypoglycemia. For this ground some issues environing endovenous drug therapy will now be discussed.
Intravenous Drug Therapy
There is an increasing acknowledgment that medicine mistakes are doing a significant planetary public wellness job. Many of these mistakes result in injury to patients and increased costs to wellness suppliers ( Wheeler & A ; Wheeler 2005 ) . In the intensive attention unit, patients normally receive multiple drug therapies that are prescribed either for contraceptive indicants or for intervention of established disease ( Dougherty 2002 ) . Practitioners caring for these patients find themselves in the ambitious place of holding to supervise these therapies, with the end of maximising a good curative response, every bit good as minimising the happening of any inauspicious drug-related result ( Cuddy 2000 ) .
The Nursing and Midwifery Council ( NMC ) ( 2004 ) identifies the readying and disposal of medical specialties as an of import facet of professional pattern, emphasizing that it is non simply a mechanistic undertaking performed in rigorous conformity with a written prescription, but instead a undertaking that requires thought and professional opinion. Heatlie ( 2003 ) found that the debut of new insulin protocols and governments could give rise to jobs, particularly when patients were to have prescribed doses of insulin in conformity with the form of calorific consumption. Concerns that nurses are non ever prepared educationally to supply comprehensive attention in this country have besides been highlighted ( Heatlie 2003 ) . Despite this, the NMC ( 2004 ) stresses the importance of exerting professional answerability, saying that the nurse has a duty to see the dose, method of disposal, path and timing of the disposal of drugs, within the context of the status of the patient and co-existing therapies.
Satarawala ( 2000 ) supports this impression, foregrounding the legal jussive mood for practicians to follow with local protocols and processs, in conformity with their contract of employment. In safeguarding patients against possible dangers, nurses have an duty to cognize drug extract indicants, inauspicious reactions and particular safeguards, and should administrate medicines or extracts at prescribed rates and within ordered intervals ( Dougherty 2002 ) . It seems, in decision, that with insulin therapy, and so any endovenous therapy, an attack is needed that balances single answerability with a well-designed system to supply safe attention for all intensive attention patients.
Decision
Current research seems to recommend the usage of an intensive insulin extract protocol to better clinical results for critically sick patients. Nurses utilizing such protocols must hold an apprehension of the importance of tight blood glucose control and be cognizant of the possible dangers of administrating endovenous insulin. Had the writer been more cognizant of these issues, the events of scenario 2 may non hold occurred. The writer has learned, that it is good to hold an apprehension of the principle which underpins interventions and patterns in the clinical scene. This can merely better the criterions of attention in clinical pattern and consequence in a safer environment for patients.
Action Plan
With the cognition and apprehension gained by reflecting on scenario 2, the writer will seek to derive a better apprehension of other protocols and guidelines that are in operation in the clinical country. In future, when new interventions or guidelines are introduced into clinical pattern, the writer will endeavor to understand them, experience competent in their usage and will promote others in the wellness attention squad to make similarly. The writer is now more cognizant of the possible dangers involved when utilizing an intensive insulin protocol, and as such the hazard of a similar state of affairs happening once more should be minimum.
Drumhead
The literature suggests that contemplation has become a cardinal constituent in nurse instruction and is going an progressively of import construct for practicians in clinical pattern. Within the sphere of brooding pattern great accent is placed on professional development and the acquisition of cognition through the survey of old experience. It seems that contemplation can be a valuable tool, helping the practician to analyze, measure and alter pattern through the deconstruction of past events.
This paper has considered issues associating to 2 scenarios experienced by the writer in clinical pattern. The application of a brooding model has allowed a structured analysis of events. As a consequence, the writer has been able to place countries of personal cognition shortage in relation to certain clinical patterns, while deriving greater penetration into broader constructs which are pertinent to all facets of intervention in intensive attention. Consequently, the demand for alteration in the writers ‘ pattern in some countries has been identified.
This brooding history has demonstrated that brooding pattern by single practicians can hold great influence in the clinical scene, conveying about positive alterations in the manner patients are cared for, and therefore, maximizing the potency for good patient results. It is recommended hence, that this attack is adopted by all wellness professionals wishing to supply expert attention in clinical pattern. In this manner, high criterions of patient attention can be achieved across all countries of wellness attention.
Mentions
Aird, W.C. ( 2003 ) The Role of the Endothelium in Severe Sepsis and Multiple Organ Dysfunction syndrome Blood Vol. 101, pp. 3765-3777
Annane, D. ( 2001 ) Effects of the Combination of Hydrocortisone-Fludro-Cortisone on Mortality in Septic Shock Critical Care Medicine Vol. 28, pp. 46
Benner, P.E. ( 1984 ) From Novice to Expert: Excellence and Power in Clinical Nursing Practice. Massachusetts: Addison Wesley
Bernard, GR. , Vincent, J.L. , Laterre, P.F. , LaRosa, S.P. , Dhainaut, J.F. , Lopez-Rodriguez, A. , Steingrub, J.S. , Garber, G.E. , Helterbrand, J.D. , Ely, E.W. , Fisher, C.J. ( 2001 ) Efficacy and Safety of Recombinant Human Activated Protein C for Severe Sepsis The New England Journal of Medicine Vol. 244 ( 10 ) , pp. 699-708
Beauchamp, T.L. , Childress, J.F. ( 1994 ) Principles of biomedical moralss ( 4th ed. ) Oxford: Oxford University Press
Bolton, G. ( 2001 ) Reflective Practice. Writing and Professional Development London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd
Bulman, C. ( 2004 ) An Introduction to Reflection In: Bulman, C. , Schutz, S. Reflective Practice in Nursing Bodmin: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 1-24
Bunch, E. , H. ( 2002 ) High Technology and Nursing: Ethical quandary Nurses and Physicians Face on High-Technology Units in Norway Nursing Inquiry Vol. 9 ( 3 ) , pp. 187-195
Callahan, D. ( 2003 ) Populating and Diing with Medical Technology Critical Care Medicine Vol. 31 ( 5 ) , pp. 344-346
Cobanoglu, N. , Algier, L. ( 2004 ) A Qualitative Analysis of Ethical Problems Experienced by Physicians and Nurses in Intensive Care Units in Turkey Nursing Ethics Vol. 11 ( 5 ) , pp. 444-458
Coursin, D.B. , Murray, M.J. ( 2003 ) How Sweet is Euglycemia in Critically Ill Patients? Mayo Clinic Proceedings Vol. 78, pp. 1460-1462
Cuddy, P.G. ( 2000 ) Monitoring Drug Therapy in the Intensive Care Unit Critical Care Nursing Quarterly Vol. 22 ( 4 ) , pp. 14-22
Curtin, L. ( 2005 ) Ethics in Information sciences: The Intersection of Nursing, Ethics and Information Technology Nursing Administration Quarterly Vol. 29 ( 4 ) , pp42-46
Das, U.N. ( 2001 ) Is Insulin an Anti-Inflammatory Molecule? Nutrition Vol. 17, pp. 409-413
Dellinger, R.P. , Carlet, J.M. , Masur, H. ( 2004 ) Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Critical Care Medicine Vol. 32 ( 3 ) , pp. 858-873
DiNardo, M. , Korytkowski, M.T. , Siminerio, L.S. ( 2004 ) The Importance of Normoglycaemia in Critically Ill Patients Critical Care Nursing Quarterly Vol. 27 ( 2 ) , pp. 126-134
Diringer, M. ( 2005 ) Improved Outcome with Aggressive Treatment of Hyperglycaemia: Ballyhoo or Hope? Neurology Vol. 64 ( 8 ) , pp. 1330-1331
Dolan, S. ( 2003 ) Severe Sepsis – A Major Challenge for Critical Care Intensive and Critical Care Nursing Vol. 19 ( 2 ) , pp. 63-67
Dougherty, L. ( 2002 ) Delivery of Intravenous Therapy Nursing Standard Vol. 16 ( 16 ) , pp. 45-52
Duke, S. ( 2004 ) When Reflection Becomes a Cul-de-Sac – Schemes to Find The Focus and Move On In: Bulman, C. , Schutz, S. Reflective Practice in Nursing Bodmin: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 146-160
Edbrooke, D.L. , Hibbert, C.L. , Kingsley, J.M. , Smith, S. , Bright, N.M. , Quinn, J.M. ( 1999 ) The Patient Costs of Care for Sepsis Patients in a United Kingdom Adult General Intensive Care Unit Critical Care Medicine Vol. 27 ( 9 ) , pp. 1760-1767
Fisher, M. ( 2004 ) Ethical Issues in The Intensive Care Unit Current Opinion in Critical attention Vol. 10 ( 4 ) , pp. 292-298
Friedman, Y. ( 2001 ) Ethical Issues in the Critically Ill Patient Current Opinion in Critical Care Vol. 7, pp. 475-79
Furnary, A.P. , Zerr, K.J. , Grunkemeier, G.L. , Starr, A. ( 1999 ) Continuous Intravenous Insulin Infusion Reduces the Incidence of Deep Sternal Wound Infection in Diabetic Patients After Cardiac Surgical Procedures. Annalss of Thoracic Surgery Vol. 67, pp. 352-362
Gedney, J. ( 2000 ) Collaboration: A Tool Addressing Ethical Issues for Elderly Patients Near the End of Life in Intensive Care Units Journal of Gerontological Nursing Vol. 26, pp. 41-47
Gibbs, G. ( 1988 ) Learning by Making. A Guide to Teaching and Learning Methods Oxford: Oxford Polytechnic
Goldberg, P.A. , Siegel, M.D. , Sherwin, R.S. , Halickman, J.I. , Lee, M. , Bailey, V.A. , Lee, S.L. , Dziura, J.D. , Inzucchi, S.E. ( 2004 ) Execution of a Safe and Effective Insulin Infusion Protocol in a Medical Intensive Care Unit Diabetes Care Vol. 27 ( 2 ) , pp. 461-467
Heatlie, J.M. ( 2003 ) Reducing Insulin Medication Mistakes: Evaluation of a Quality Improvement Initiative Journal for Nurses in Staff Development Vol. 19 ( 2 ) , pp. 92-98
Hewitt, J. ( 2002 ) A Critical Reappraisal of the Arguments Debating the Role of the Nurse Advocate Journal of Advanced Nursing Vol. 37 ( 5 ) , pp. 439-445
Hendricks, J. , Mooney, D. , Berry, C. ( 1996 ) A Practical Approach to The Use of Reflective Practice in Critical Care Settings Intensive & A ; Critical Care Nursing Vol. 12, pp. 512-519
Hewitt, J. ( 2002 ) A Critical Reappraisal of the Arguments Debating the Role of the Nurse Advocate Journal of Advanced Nursing Vol. 37 ( 5 ) , pp. 439-445
Hotchkiss, R. , and Karl, I. ( 2003 ) The Pathophysiology and Treatment of Sepsis New England Journal of Medicine Vol. 348 ( 2 ) , pp. 138-150
Khoury, W. , Klausner, J.M. , Ben-Abraham, R. , Szold, O. ( 2004 ) Glucose Control by Insulin for Critically Ill Surgical Patients The Journal of Trauma Injury, Infection and Critical Care Vol. 57 ( 5 ) , pp. 1132-113
Kleinpell, Ruth M. ( 2004 ) Working Out the Complexities of Severe Sepsis Nursing Management Vol. 35 ( 5 ) , pp. 481-488
Krinsley, J.S. ( 2004 ) Effects of an Intensive Glucose Management Protocol on the Mortality of Critically Ill Adult Patients Mayo Clinic Proceedings Vol. 79 ( 8 ) , pp. 992-1000
Laird, A. , Miller, P.R. , Kilgo, P.D. , Meredith, J. , Chang, M.C. ( 2004 ) Relationship of Early Hyperglycaemia to Mortality in Trauma Patients The Journal of Trauma Injury, Infection and Critical Care Vol. 56 ( 5 ) , pp. 1058-1062
Langouche, L. , Vanhorebeek, I. , Vlasselaers, D. , Vander Perre, S. , Wouters, P.J. , Skogstrand, K. , Hansen, T.K. , Van den Berghe, G. ( 2005 ) Intensive Insulin Therapy Protects the Endothelium of Critically Ill Patients The Journal of Clinical Investigation Vol. 115 ( 8 ) , pp. 2277-2286
Mallik, M. ( 1998 ) Advocacy in Nursing: Percepts and Attitudes of the Nursing Elite in the United Kingdom Journal of Advanced Nursing Vol. 28, pp. 1001-1011.
Malmberg, K. ( 1997 ) DIGAMI Study Group: Prospective Randomised Study of Intensive Insulin Treatment on Long-Term Survival After Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus. British Medical Journal Vol. 314, pp.1512-1515
Mamede, S. , Schmidt, H.G. ( 2004 ) The Structure of Reflective Practice in Medicine Medical Education Vol. 38 ( 12 ) , pp. 1302-1308
Mantzoukas, S. , Jasper, M. ( 2004 ) Reflective Practice and Daily Ward Reality: A Covert Power Game Journal of Clinical Nursing Vol. 13 ( 8 ) , pp. 925-933
McCowen, K.C. , Malhotra, A. , Bistrian, B.R. ( 2001 ) Stress Induced Hyperglycaemia Critical Care Clinics Vol. 17, pp. 107-124
Melia, K.M. ( 2001 ) Ethical Issues and The Importance of Consensus for The Intensive Care Team Social Science & A ; Medicine Vol. 53 ( 6 ) , pp. 707-719
National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Drotrecogin alfa ( activated ) for Severe Sepsis. London: National Institute for Clinical excellence, 2004
Nursing and Midwifery Council. ( 2004 ) Guidelines for the Administration of Medicines London: NMC Publications
Oberle, K. , Hughes, D. ( 2001 ) Doctors ‘ and Nurses ‘ Percepts of Ethical Problems in End-of-Life Decisions Journal of Advanced Nursing Vol. 33 ( 6 ) , pp. 707-715
Prien, T. , Van Aken, H. ( 1999 ) Ethical Dilemmas in Intensive Care: Can the Problem be Solved? Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology Vol. 12 ( 2 ) , pp. 203-206
Monetary value, A. ( 2004 ) Encouraging Reflection and Critical Thinking in Practice Nursing Standard Vol. 18 ( 47 ) , pp. 46-54
Reid, B. ( 1993 ) Researching a Response to the Concept of Reflective Practice in Order to Better its Facilitation Nurse Education Today Vol. 13, pp. 305-309
Reed, J. , Ground, I. ( 1997 ) Doctrine for Nursing. London: Arnold
Robson, W. , Newell, J. ( 2005 ) Assessing, Treating and Managing Patients With Sepsis Nursing Standard Vol.19 ( 50 ) , pp. 56-64
Rolfe, G ( 2005 ) The Deconstructing Angel: Nursing, Reflection and Evidence-Based Practice Nursing Inquiry Vol. 12 ( 2 ) , pp. 78-86
Satarawala, R. ( 2000 ) Confronting the Legal Perils of IV Therapy Nursing Vol. 30 ( 8 ) , pp. 44-47
Slade, E. , Tamber, P.S. , Vincent, J.L. ( 2003 ) The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Raising Awareness to Reduce Mortality Critical Care Vol. 7 ( 1 ) , pp. 1-2
Snowball, J. ( 1996 ) Asking Nurses About Recommending for Patients: ‘Reactive ‘ and ‘Proactive ‘ Accounts Journal of Advanced Nursing Vol. 24 ( 1 ) , pp. 67-75
Van lair Berghe, G. , Wouters, P. , Weekers, F. , Verwaest, C. , Bruyninckx, F. , Schetz, M. , Vlasselaers, D. , Ferdinande, P. , Lauwers, P. , Bouillon, R. ( 2001 ) Intensive Insulin Therapy in Critically Ill Patients New England Journal of Medicine Vol. 345 ( 19 ) , pp. 1359-1367
Van lair Berghe, G. , Wouters, P.J. , Bouillon, R. ( 2003 ) Outcome Benefit of Intensive Insulin Therapy in the critically Ill: Insulin Dose Versus Glycemic Control Critical Care Medicine Vol. 31, pp. 359-366
Washington, G. T. ( 2001 ) Family Advocates: Lovingness for Families in Crisis Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing Vol. 20 ( 1 ) , pp. 36-40
Wheeler, S.J. , Wheeler, D.W. ( 2005 ) Medicine Mistakes in Anaesthesia and Critical Care Anaesthesia Vol. 60 ( 3 ) , pp. 257-273
Woodrow, P. ( 2000 ) Intensive Care Nursing A Model for Practice London: Routledge